In the dynamic landscape of fleet management, transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) represents a critical strategy for reducing CO2 emissions and achieving sustainability targets. The "CO2 Reduction Scenario: Transition Recommendation" section delves into the nuanced process of recommending EV adoption based on a multifaceted analysis of your fleet's current status and potential for change. Utilizing specific data points such as EV readiness, market share, and environmental performance indexes, we craft customized transition strategies. This approach ensures that recommendations for moving towards more sustainable vehicle models are both realistic and impactful, catering to the unique conditions of each country and region within your operational footprint.
Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, UK, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland
Immediate EV Adoption
Immediate transition to BEVs, excluding vehicles in the U and M segments or those with high mileage (over 30,000 km/year).
Excluding U and M segments and high milage (More than 30,000 km/year), all car should be BEV.
Germany, Netherlands, Ireland
Encouraged Transition with Focus on Sustainability
Shift to BEVs, which offer about 40% lower CO2 emissions compared to Full Hybrid Electric Vehicles (FHEVs). Transitioning to sustainable electricity sources is also crucial.
Excluding U and M segments and high milage (More than 30,000 km/year), all car should be BEV.
Canada, Italy, Spain, New Zealand
Selective EV Adoption with High CO2 Reduction Impact
BEVs suitable for limited environments, offering approximately 60% lower CO2 emissions than FHEVs. High market share of BEVs suggests prioritizing these models.
BEV at 40%, which is quite high compared to the market, but the contribution to CO2 reduction is very high
USA(Average), South Korea, Greece, Japan
Limited EV Operation with Moderate Emission Benefits
BEVs feasible in limited contexts, with CO2 emissions around 30% less than FHEVs. PHEVs recommended for low mileage use.
Limited BEV, PHEV is for low milage car, Mainly FHEV
Mexico, Czech Republic, Thailand, UAE, Taiwan
Very Limited EV Adoption Due to Environmental Considerations
BEVs are viable in highly restricted scenarios. The reduction in CO2 emissions is not substantial compared to FHEVs. Prioritizing sustainable electricity in operations is advised.
Very Limited BEV. Mainly FHEV (Asia OEM can be used)
Indonesia, Poland, Australia, South Africa, Malaysia
FHEV Preference Due to Infrastructural Limitations
FHEVs preferred due to lower CO2 emissions unless there is access to sustainable electricity supply. Challenges with infrastructure support this direction.
No BEV and PHEV. All to FHEV (Asia OEM can be used)
Philippines, Turkey, Ecuador, Guatemala, Indonesia, Egypt, India
FHEVs as the Only Option
Economic and infrastructural barriers make the adoption of BEVs and PHEVs unfeasible. Transition to FHEVs is the recommended path.
No BEV and PHEV. All to FHEV (Asia OEM can be used)
Special Considerations
These countries have distinct attributes that necessitate a unique approach, treated separately from the other categories.
These countries have different characteristics from the others, so we treated them specially as other
Recommendation & Average of Total CO2e per km
This table synthesizes our transition recommendations with the average CO2e emissions per kilometer, offering a visual representation of the potential impact of adopting EVs across different regions. It highlights the correlation between our recommendations and the expected reduction in CO2e emissions, underscoring the environmental advantages of transitioning to electric mobility.
Interpretation Guidance:
Recommendation Categories: Understand the rationale behind each category (A, B, C, etc.), reflecting the varying degrees of EV adoption readiness and potential environmental impact.
Average CO2e per km: Examine how different recommendation categories correlate with average CO2e emissions, providing insight into where electrification efforts can yield the most significant environmental benefits.
